Home

This module examines the role of criminal defenses in limiting or eliminating criminal liability when certain legal justifications or excuses are present. Through the assigned readings, you will explore how defenses such as self defense, defense of others, castle law, and necessity are evaluated by courts, particularly in cases involving the use of force. These defenses reflect the law’s effort to balance individual rights to protect oneself and others with broader concerns for public safety and proportionality.

The learning activities in this module move from applied reasoning to judicial analysis. You will begin by analyzing a hypothetical scenario involving a homeowner charged with a violent offense and determining which criminal defense may apply based on the facts. You will then brief a criminal case using the IRAC model, focusing on how courts assess affirmative defenses, duties to retreat, and the lawful use of force. Together, these activities strengthen your ability to evaluate defensive claims and explain how legal standards shape outcomes in criminal cases.

• Complete assigned readings or instructional materials.
• Participate in discussions or applied learning activities.
• Complete written, practical, creative, or problem-based assignments.
• Review instructor feedback and module expectations.
• Review all materials carefully before beginning assignments.
• Follow assignment instructions and grading rubrics closely.
• Proofread all submissions before posting or uploading.
• Ask questions early if anything is unclear.